UXPin vs. Figma: Comparison & Expert Review For 2025
UXPin offers an intuitive solution for UX designers seeking to create engaging, interactive prototypes. Figma provides a collaborative platform that's ideal for teams working in real time. While both tools cater to UX design needs, UXPin is known for its advanced prototyping capabilities, whereas Figma shines with its collaborative features.
In this article, we'll compare these UX design tools, examining their features, pros and cons, and pricing to help you determine which is the right fit for your team.
UXPin vs. Figma: An Overview
UXPin
Figma
Why Trust Our Software Reviews
UXPin vs. Figma Pricing Comparison
| UXPin | Figma | |
|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | 14-day free trial + free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing | From $6/user/month | From $15/user/month (billed annually) |
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowUXPin vs. Figma Pricing & Hidden Costs
UXPin pricing is structured around tiered plans that cater to different team sizes, with additional costs for accessing advanced features or higher levels of collaboration. Figma pricing also uses a tiered model, but it emphasizes flexibility with its free version for individual users and scalable plans for teams, though costs may rise with increased usage or team collaboration. To select the tool with the right pricing for your needs, evaluate your team's size, feature requirements, and collaboration level to determine which pricing structure aligns best with your workflow and growth plans.
UXPin vs. Figma Feature Comparison
With UXPin’s advanced prototyping, you can create highly interactive and detailed prototypes, making it invaluable for testing user flows in complex applications and conducting early-stage user testing with realistic interactions. Figma’s real-time collaboration feature is great for design teams working remotely, as it allows everyone to contribute and make changes in a shared design space simultaneously. While UXPin excels in creating detailed prototypes that can simulate real product behavior, Figma’s strength lies in fostering smooth team collaboration and rapid iteration during product design cycles.
| UXPin | Figma | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-Factor Authentication | ||
| API | ||
| Batch Permissions & Access | ||
| Budgeting | ||
| Bug Tracking | ||
| Calendar Management | ||
| Contact Management | ||
| Contact Sharing | ||
| Customer Management | ||
| Dashboard | ||
| Data Export | ||
| Data Import | ||
| Data Visualization | ||
| Email Integration | ||
| Expense Tracking | ||
| External Integrations | ||
| Gantt Charts | ||
| Google Apps Integration | ||
| Multi-User | ||
| Notifications | ||
| Project Management | ||
| Resource Management | ||
| Scheduling | ||
| Task Scheduling/Tracking | ||
| Third-Party Plugins/Add-Ons | ||
| Travel Management |
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowUXPin vs. Figma Integrations
| Integration | UXPin | Figma |
|---|---|---|
| Jira | ✅ | ✅ |
| Slack | ✅ | ✅ |
| Microsoft Teams | ❌ | ✅ |
| Trello | ✅ | ✅ |
| Adobe XD | ❌ | ✅ |
| Sketch | ✅ | ✅ |
| Notion | ❌ | ✅ |
| Miro | ✅ | ✅ |
| API | ✅ | ✅ |
| Photoshop Artboard | ✅ | ✅ |
| Zapier | ✅ | ✅ |
With UXPin's integration with Jira, you can streamline your design and development workflow by ensuring design updates are synchronized across teams, making it perfect for iterative design processes. Figma's integration with Slack is great for keeping your team informed in real-time, as it allows instant notifications and discussions about design changes. While UXPin enhances development coordination, Figma excels in fostering team communication and collaboration.
UXPin vs. Figma Security, Compliance & Reliability
| Factor | UXPin | Figma |
|---|---|---|
| Data Encryption | UXPin encrypts data both at rest and in transit to protect sensitive information from unauthorized access. | Figma uses AES-256 encryption for data at rest and TLS for data in transit, ensuring robust data protection. |
| Regulatory Compliance | UXPin complies with GDPR regulations, providing tools for data subject requests and data processing agreements. | Figma adheres to GDPR and CCPA, offering compliance features like data export and deletion capabilities. |
| Reliability | UXPin claims to offer 99.9% uptime and continuous monitoring to ensure service reliability and performance. | Figma maintains that it also offers high reliability with 99.9% uptime, supported by real-time backup and recovery solutions. |
In terms of security and compliance, both UXPin and Figma offer strong encryption and adhere to major data protection regulations, ensuring your data is safe and compliant. To evaluate these tools, focus on the specific security and compliance features that align with your project requirements, such as encryption standards and regulatory adherence, to determine which vendor meets your team's needs.
UXPin vs. Figma Ease of Use
| Factor | UXPin | Figma |
|---|---|---|
| User Interface | Offers a detailed interface with advanced prototyping tools, suitable for complex designs. | Provides a clean and intuitive interface, making it accessible for beginners. |
| Onboarding | Provides guided tutorials, screenshots, and documentation to assist new users. | Offers an interactive onboarding process with in-app tips and an intuitive user experience. |
| Collaboration | Supports real-time collaboration, though some setup may be required for team workflows. With UXPin Merge, teams can use live React components as part of their design system, making UXPin a single source of truth that reflects production-ready UI. | Excels in real-time collaboration, allowing multiple team members to work on the same file instantly. Figma is built for cross-platform workflows—whether on Mac, Windows, or web. |
UXPin's advanced features cater to complex projects, though they may present a learning curve for new users. Figma's user-friendly interface and real-time collaboration capabilities make it ideal for teams seeking quick adaptation and efficient teamwork.
UXPin vs Figma: Pros & Cons
UXPin
- It offers design systems management to maintain consistency across projects.
- UXPin supports team collaboration with real-time updates and feedback.
- You can create interactive prototypes that mirror real-world applications.
- It may lack certain customization options that other tools provide.
- The interface can be overwhelming for new users with its extensive features.
- Some users find the learning curve a bit steep initially.
Figma
- Design Systems: Figma has strong features for generating and managing design files and systems to maintain consistency.
- Prototyping: Users can easily create interactive prototypes to test and showcase designs in Figma.
- Collaboration: Figma enables real-time collaboration with other designers, stakeholders and developers in the same document.
- Browser-Based Limitations – Running in a browser allows Figma to be accessible anywhere, but it also means it's subject to browser constraints. Intensive tasks, like rendering high-resolution graphics or managing extensive design systems, can sometimes lead to memory consumption issues or sluggish interactions.
- Performance Issues with Large Files – While Figma is optimized for speed, large and complex design files can still cause slowdowns, particularly on lower-end devices or in resource-constrained browser environments.
- Vector Editing, Animation, and 3D Design: Figma's tools have some limitations compared to more powerful graphic design software.
Best Use Cases for UXPin and Figma
UXPin
- Tech Startups Your team can benefit from UXPin’s real-time collaboration and prototyping features to iterate quickly and efficiently.
- Creative Agencies UXPin’s design systems management helps your agency maintain brand consistency across various client projects.
- Product Development Teams You can utilize UXPin’s interactive prototypes to test and refine user experiences before full-scale development.
- UI/UX Designers UXPin offers the tools you need to create detailed and interactive designs that meet client expectations.
- Education Institutions Your design students can learn industry-standard prototyping and design skills using UXPin’s comprehensive feature set.
- Mid-Sized Businesses UXPin provides the scalability and collaborative tools your growing teams need for effective design workflows.
Figma
- Startups Figma's affordability and ease of use make it an excellent choice for startups with limited budgets and design resources.
- Collaborative Teams The software’s real-time collaboration features allow designers, developers, and stakeholders to work together on projects.
- Education Figma's free plan and user-friendly interface make it a great tool for teaching UX design to students and beginners.
- Mobile App Design The software has a set of mobile design templates and features that make it well-suited for designing mobile apps.
- Design Systems Figma's component and style features make it easy to create and maintain consistent design systems across projects.
- Remote Work Figma is web-based, so it's ideal for remote teams that need to collaborate on design projects from different locations.
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowWho Should Use UXPin, and Who Should Use Figma?
In my opinion, UXPin is best for design professionals working on complex, interactive prototypes where advanced features are necessary to test user flows thoroughly. It's ideal for industries that require detailed and high-fidelity designs, such as automotive or aerospace. On the other hand, I believe Figma suits teams that prioritize collaboration and quick iteration, making it perfect for startups or creative agencies. If your team values ease of use and needs a tool that integrates smoothly with other platforms, Figma is likely the better choice.
Differences Between UXPin and Figma
| UXPin | Figma | |
|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | UXPin supports collaboration but may require setup for team workflows. | Figma excels in real-time collaboration, allowing instant teamwork on design files. |
| Integrations | UXPin integrates with tools like Jira and Zapier to support workflow automation and team collaboration. With UXPin Merge, teams can also import React components directly from their codebase, enabling live, code-based prototyping. | Figma integrates with platforms like Slack and Microsoft Teams for real-time communication. While it doesn't support code-based components natively, teams can use third-party plugins to export designs into React code for developer handoff. |
| Pricing | UXPin uses tiered pricing based on team size and feature access. | Figma offers a flexible pricing model with a free version and scalable team plans. |
| Prototyping Features | UXPin offers advanced prototyping tools for creating complex interactions and animations. | Figma provides basic prototyping capabilities, suitable for simpler design flows. |
| User Interface | UXPin caters to advanced users who work with component libraries, UI components, and vector graphics. It’s well-suited for code-based prototyping and offers precise control over typography and layout. | Figma's interface is clean and intuitive, from dropdown menus to user-friendly templates. Its web-based platform supports UI elements, UI kits, and vector graphics, making it easy to create polished, accessible designs. |
| Read UXPin ReviewOpens new window | Read Figma ReviewOpens new window |
Similarities Between UXPin and Figma
| Cross-Platform Access | UXPin and Figma are accessible on both macOS and Windows, allowing your team to work seamlessly from any device, anywhere. |
|---|---|
| Data Security | Both design systems prioritize data security, using encryption and compliance with regulations like GDPR to protect your work. |
| Design Collaboration | Both UXPin and Figma support collaborative design, allowing designers to work together on projects, although Figma does this in real-time, while UXPin may require some setup. |
| Integrations | UXPin and Figma both offer plugins and integrations with popular tools like Slack and Zapier, streamlining your design workflow and communication. |
| User-Friendly Tools | Both tools offer intuitive design tools that cater to beginners and advanced designers, ensuring everyone on your team can contribute effectively while also easily sharing wireframes, high-fidelity prototypes, or facilitating handoff of final products to stakeholders. |
| Read UXPin ReviewOpens new window Read Figma ReviewOpens new window | |