Os 10 melhores concorrentes do Figma que testei em 2026

Análises das melhores alternativas ao Figma

1. 

   1

   Visily

   Best for AI-generated screens from text or image

   • Free plan available
   • From $14/user/month

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.8/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Visily is an AI-powered UX design and prototyping platform for product teams, founders, and business stakeholders who need to turn early ideas into usable interfaces without advanced design skills.

   Who Is Visily Best For?

   Product managers and UX teams can turn written ideas or reference images into editable interface concepts during early discovery.

   Why I Picked Visily

   I picked Visily as one of the best for AI-generated screens from text or image. I use text prompts to create editable wireframes, then refine layouts for product concepts without starting from a blank canvas. Its screenshot-to-design feature also helps my team turn competitor references or legacy screens into workable interface drafts.

   Visily Key Features

   • UI component library: Add reusable interface elements to wireframes and prototypes.
   • Interactive prototyping: Link screens to create clickable product flows.
   • Design templates: Start projects with pre-built templates for common product patterns.
   • Team collaboration: Invite teammates to comment on and review designs.

   Visily Integrations

   Visily offers documented integrations with Slack and Notion, plus an official Figma plugin for two-way design transfer. It also supports MCP connections through plugins for tools including Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, and Kiro.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Supports clickable prototypes and reusable components
   • Converts screenshots into workable interface drafts
   • Generates editable wireframes from text prompts

   Cons:

   • Complex design systems need manual refinement
   • High-fidelity visual design tools remain limited
   Learn more about Visily:

   • Check out Visily on their website
2. 

   2

   Mockplus

   Best for offline-first prototyping with desktop apps

   • Free plan + 30-day free trial + free demo available
   • From $4.95/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.5/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Mockplus is a UX design and prototyping tool for product teams that need to turn ideas into interactive mockups, test user flows, and align designers, engineers, and stakeholders without relying on Figma.

   Who Is Mockplus Best For?

   Mockplus suits product teams and UX designers who need desktop-based prototyping with offline access for focused design work.

   Why I Picked Mockplus

   I picked Mockplus for offline-first prototyping with desktop apps because I can design and test interactive flows without depending on a browser connection. Its desktop workspace supports clickable prototypes, screen linking, and interaction states for testing app journeys locally. I use it to review product concepts during travel, workshops, or restricted-network sessions.

   Mockplus Key Features

   • Drag-and-drop editor: Build screens by placing elements directly onto the canvas.
   • Components and icons: Add reusable interface elements from built-in libraries.
   • Notes and flowcharts: Document requirements and map user journeys within projects.
   • Comments and annotations: Add feedback directly to designs with pins and shapes.

   Mockplus Integrations

   Mockplus documents integrations with Figma, Sketch, Axure, Adobe XD, Photoshop, Slack, Jira, Confluence, and Lark, although some are design import or collaboration connections rather than native Mockplus RP integrations. Its Jira integration is also available through the Atlassian Marketplace.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Includes flowcharts, notes, and annotations
   • Supports clickable prototypes and interaction states
   • Works offline through dedicated desktop apps

   Cons:

   • Advanced interface design needs more manual setup
   • Collaboration feels less browser-native than Figma
   Learn more about Mockplus:

   • Check out Mockplus on their website
3. 

   3

   Webflow

   Best for website design without developer handoff

   • Free plan + free demo available
   • From $29/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.4/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Webflow is a visual web design platform for product, marketing, and UX teams that need to create responsive websites, test ideas, and publish polished experiences without relying on developer handoff.

   Who Is Webflow Best For?

   Webflow suits startups and lean marketing teams that need to launch polished, responsive websites without adding developer work to every update.

   Why I Picked Webflow

   I picked Webflow because it supports website design without developer handoff. I use its visual canvas, responsive layout controls, and reusable components to turn UX concepts into polished, production-ready pages. Its interactions and CMS help my team validate responsive flows and publish real content directly in the browser.

   Webflow Key Features

   • Form submissions: Collect and manage responses from published website forms.
   • Custom code embeds: Add HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to supported site areas.
   • SEO controls: Edit page titles, meta descriptions, slugs, and indexing settings.
   • Site search: Add searchable content indexes to published websites.

   Webflow Integrations

   Webflow supports marketplace integrations with Airtable, Google Docs, and Google Workspace, plus Zapier. It also provides a Data API for custom integrations, including CMS, forms, assets, ecommerce, webhooks, and site publishing.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Interactions preview closer to shipped websites
   • CMS enables testing designs with real content
   • Production-ready responsive layouts reduce developer handoff

   Cons:

   • Limited freeform prototyping for app workflows
   • Layout controls require understanding CSS concepts
   Learn more about Webflow:

   • Check out Webflow on their website
4. 

   4

   MockFlow

   Best for planning UI before handing off to design

   • Free plan available
   • From $9/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.3/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   MockFlow is a collaborative UI design tool for product managers, UX designers, and teams that need to turn early ideas into wireframes and prototypes without Figma’s broader design complexity.

   Who Is MockFlow Best For?

   Product managers and UX teams can use MockFlow to turn rough product concepts into annotated wireframes before design and engineering handoff.

   Why I Picked MockFlow

   I picked MockFlow because my team uses it to turn rough product ideas into structured wireframes before design begins. Its wireframe editor and annotation tools help us document screens, interactions, and open questions in one workspace. We can then share a clickable prototype for feedback before handing clearer requirements to designers.

   MockFlow Key Features

   • UI templates: Start projects with prebuilt layouts for common interfaces.
   • Component library: Add reusable interface elements to wireframe pages.
   • Sitemap builder: Organize website pages into a visual site structure.
   • Export options: Download designs in formats such as PDF and PNG.

   MockFlow Integrations

   MockFlow offers documented integrations with Atlassian Jira, Atlassian Confluence, Google Drive, Google Docs, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Microsoft Word through Microsoft 365. These integrations let teams create, attach, or insert wireframes within their existing collaboration and documentation tools.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Sitemap builder maps information architecture
   • Annotated flows support design handoff
   • Quick wireframes clarify product requirements

   Cons:

   • Prototype interactions feel comparatively limited
   • Visual fidelity trails polished design tools
   Learn more about MockFlow:

   • Check out MockFlow on their website
5. 

   5

   UXPin

   Best for designing with production React components

   • Free plan + 14-day free trial + demo available
   • From $49/user/month

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.2/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   UXPin is a UX design platform for product teams that need to create, test, and hand off high-fidelity interfaces while keeping designers, developers, and stakeholders aligned.

   Who Is UXPin Best For?

   UXPin suits product teams that need designers and developers to build interfaces with production React components.

   Why I Picked UXPin

   I picked UXPin because it lets my team design with production React components instead of approximating them in static mockups. We can use coded components, real properties, and interactive states to prototype a checkout flow with the same UI building blocks developers ship. That keeps design reviews focused on behavior and implementation details.

   UXPin Key Features

   • Variables: Store user inputs and reuse values across prototypes.
   • Conditional interactions: Create if-then and if-else prototype flows.
   • Auto layout: Arrange and resize elements within flexible layouts.
   • Comments: Add feedback directly to designs and prototypes.

   UXPin Integrations

   UXPin offers documented integrations with FullStory, Figma, Sketch, Git, Storybook, Jira, Adobe Fonts, Google Fonts, and Slack. Its Git and Storybook integrations support designing with production React and web components, which makes it especially useful for teams evaluating Figma alternatives.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Tests realistic interactions before development
   • Supports variables and conditional prototype logic
   • Designs with production React components

   Cons:

   • Canvas feels less fluid than Figma
   • Component setup requires developer involvement
   Learn more about UXPin:

   • Check out UXPin on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of UXPin
6. 

   6

   Framer

   Best for interactive website prototypes

   • Free plan + free trial available
   • From $10/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.4/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Framer is a visual website design and prototyping platform for product designers and marketing teams who need to create interactive experiences, test ideas, and publish polished sites without switching tools.

   Who Is Framer Best For?

   Product designers and marketing teams who need to prototype and publish responsive websites without relying on developers.

   Why I Picked Framer

   I picked Framer because I can turn interactive website prototypes into published, responsive pages from the same visual canvas. I use breakpoints to test layouts across screen sizes, then add scroll effects, hover states, and page transitions for realistic product flows. This helps my team validate marketing sites and web experiences before development begins.

   Framer Key Features

   • CMS collections: Create structured content for blogs, case studies, and other pages.
   • Localization: Translate site content and adapt pages for different locales.
   • Forms: Add customizable forms to collect visitor submissions.
   • Components: Build reusable elements with shared properties and variations.

   Framer Integrations

   Framer offers built-in integrations with Google Tag Manager, Formspark, Hotjar, HubSpot forms, Intercom, Mailchimp, Marketo forms, Meta Pixel, Typeform, and Clay. Formspark supports Slack, Zapier, and Integromat, while Framer also provides custom webhooks and a Server API for custom integrations.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Reusable components support consistent page systems
   • Strong animations, transitions, and scroll effects
   • Publishes responsive prototypes without developer handoff

   Cons:

   • Advanced layouts can require CSS knowledge
   • Less suited to native app prototyping
   Learn more about Framer:

   • Check out Framer on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Framer
   • Explore best alternatives to Framer
7. 

   7

   Axure RP

   Best for logic-driven, no-code prototypes

   • Free plan + 30-day free trial available
   • From $29/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   

   Axure RP is a UX design and prototyping tool for product teams that need to map complex user flows, test detailed interactions, and align stakeholders before development begins.

   Who Is Axure RP Best For?

   UX designers and product teams who need to model conditional workflows, dynamic interfaces, and detailed user interactions before development.

   Why I Picked Axure RP

   I picked Axure RP because it handles interaction-heavy product concepts that Figma can’t model as deeply. Its conditional logic, variables, and dynamic panels let my team prototype branching onboarding, permissions, and form validation without code. I use it for Best for logic-driven, no-code prototypes when stakeholders need to test realistic workflows before engineering.

   Axure RP Key Features

   • Adaptive views: Create layouts for different screen sizes and orientations.
   • Repeaters: Build sortable, filterable lists from reusable data sets.
   • Widget libraries: Save and reuse custom interface components across projects.
   • Prototype notes: Add annotations, requirements, and interaction documentation.

   Axure RP Integrations

   Axure RP offers official integrations with Jira, Confluence, Slack, and Microsoft Teams for embedding prototypes and sharing project activity. It also supports importing design assets from Figma, Sketch, and Adobe XD through dedicated plugins.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Detailed interactions validate realistic form behavior
   • Repeaters support sortable, filterable data lists
   • Conditional logic models branching workflows

   Cons:

   • Real-time collaboration trails browser-first competitors
   • Visual design feels slower than Figma
   Learn more about Axure RP :

   • Check out Axure RP on their website
8. 

   8

   Penpot

   Best for self-hosted, open-source design

   • Free plan + 14-day free trial + free demo available
   • From $7/user/month

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.5/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Penpot is a UX design platform for product teams that need collaborative wireframing, prototyping, and design handoff with greater control over their tools and workflows.

   Who Is Penpot Best For?

   Penpot suits product teams that need open-source design collaboration and the option to host UX workflows on their own infrastructure.

   Why I Picked Penpot

   I picked Penpot because it is best for self-hosted, open-source design. I can deploy it on my team’s infrastructure, retain control over project data, and review its source code. Its browser-based boards, SVG workflows, and CSS Grid and Flex Layout support help my team create production-ready interfaces.

   Penpot Key Features

   • Components: Create reusable interface elements with configurable properties and variants.
   • Design Tokens: Define reusable colors, spacing, typography, and other design values.
   • Prototyping: Connect screens with interactions, transitions, overlays, and animations.
   • Inspect Mode: Review measurements, properties, and implementation details for selected objects.

   Penpot Integrations

   Penpot doesn’t have clearly documented native integrations with third-party tools. It supports plugins through PenpotHub or direct URLs, plus webhooks for creating custom connections with other services.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • SVG workflows support developer-friendly design handoff
   • CSS Grid and Flex Layout work directly on canvas
   • Self-hosted deployment keeps design data under control

   Cons:

   • Some production workflows remain less mature than Figma’s
   • Large files can become noticeably laggy
   Learn more about Penpot:

   • Check out Penpot on their website
9. 

   9

   Sketch

   Best for macOS-native design workflows

   • Free plan + 30-day free trial available
   • From $12/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.5/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Sketch gives product and UX teams a focused design platform for creating interfaces, prototypes, and design systems while reducing collaboration friction across research, design, and development.

   Who Is Sketch Best For?

   Sketch suits product designers and UX teams that want a macOS-native workspace for interface design, prototyping, and design system development.

   Why I Picked Sketch

   I picked Sketch because its macOS-native app gives my team a focused workspace for interface design. We use symbols, components, and shared libraries to maintain consistent design systems across product screens. Its prototyping and developer handoff features help us move a Mac-based workflow from early flows to implementation.

   Sketch Key Features

   • Comments: Add feedback directly to designs and resolve discussion threads.
   • Version history: Review earlier document versions and restore previous work.
   • Workspace permissions: Control who can view, edit, or manage documents.
   • Browser access: Open, review, and share designs through Sketch’s web app.

   Sketch Integrations

   Sketch offers integrations through its plugin ecosystem, including Slack, Jira, Zeplin, ProtoPie, Principle, Frontify, and Brandfolder. It also provides an official JavaScript API and file-format specification for custom integrations.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Browser-based inspection helps developers review designs
   • Shared libraries support consistent design systems
   • Native macOS performance feels fast and responsive

   Cons:

   • Real-time collaboration trails Figma for larger teams
   • Mac app excludes Windows-based designers
   Learn more about Sketch:

   • Check out Sketch on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Sketch
   • Explore best alternatives to Sketch
10. 

    10

    Zeplin

    Best for design-to-dev handoff with AI coding agents

    • Free plan + free demo available
    • From $12/user/month (billed annually)

    Visit Website

    

    For product teams seeking a Figma alternative, Zeplin is a design collaboration and handoff platform that helps designers, developers, and product managers share specs, assets, and context without losing alignment.

    Who Is Zeplin Best For?

    Zeplin suits product and engineering teams that need design context, specs, and assets to guide AI coding agents from approved designs.

    Why I Picked Zeplin

    I picked Zeplin because it gives AI coding agents clear context from approved designs. My team uses its design specs and exported assets to guide implementation without relying on screenshots alone. That makes handoff more precise when developers need to translate a finished interface into working code.

    Zeplin Key Features

    • Design versioning: Compare screen updates and review changes across versions.
    • Styleguides: Organize colors, text styles, spacing, and components in shared libraries.
    • Screen annotations: Add notes and discussions directly to individual screens.
    • Workflow integrations: Connect projects with tools such as Jira, Slack, and Azure DevOps.

    Zeplin Integrations

    Zeplin offers official integrations with Jira, Azure DevOps, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Storybook, Trello, and VS Code, plus design publishing integrations for Figma, Sketch, Photoshop, and Adobe XD. It also provides an API and webhooks for custom workflows, with MCP support for AI tools such as Claude, Cursor, and VS Code.

    Pros and Cons

    Pros:

    • Version comparisons clarify approved interface changes
    • Screen annotations keep design decisions attached
    • Exported specs guide implementation beyond screenshots

    Cons:

    • Requires separate design tool for creation
    • Primarily supports handoff after design completion
    Learn more about Zeplin:

    • Check out Zeplin on their website