10 Melhores Ferramentas de Feedback de Design para Equipas Criativas em 2026

As 10 melhores ferramentas de feedback de design

1. 

   1

   Userback

   Best for live web and staging feedback with AI triage

   • Free plan available
   • From $9/user/month

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.8/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Userback is a web-based feedback tool that lets teams collect annotated screenshots, video recordings, and session replays directly on live websites, staging environments, and web apps.

   Who Is Userback Best For?

   Userback is a strong fit for product and engineering teams that need to collect and triage feedback directly on live websites, web apps, or staging environments.

   Why I Picked Userback

   I picked Userback as one of the best because it's purpose-built for collecting feedback directly on live websites and staging environments, which puts it in a category of its own. The embeddable widget and browser extension let reviewers pin annotated screenshots and record video with audio right on a deployed page, capturing console logs and browser metadata automatically alongside each submission. What really sets it apart is AI triage: Userback's AI Assist categorizes incoming feedback, detects recurring themes, and flags items needing a response, so nothing gets buried.

   Userback Key Features

   • Embeddable feedback widget: A JavaScript snippet you install on any live site or staging environment to let users submit annotated screenshots and video recordings directly from the page.
   • Session replay: Records complete user sessions—capturing clicks, scrolling, rage clicks, and form inputs—for playback alongside submitted feedback items on Business plans and above.
   • Two-way sync with dev tools: Connects to Jira, Linear, and ClickUp so that resolving an issue in either platform automatically updates its status in the other.
   • Console log and metadata capture: Automatically attaches browser version, OS, screen resolution, URL, console logs, and network requests to every feedback submission for developer context.

   Userback Integrations

   Userback offers native integrations with Jira, Linear, ClickUp, GitHub, GitLab, Slack, and Microsoft Teams, plus REST API, webhooks, and Zapier support for custom connectivity.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • AI triage surfaces recurring feedback themes
   • Video feedback clarifies complex design issues
   • Live website annotations with technical context

   Cons:

   • No side-by-side design version comparison
   • No native Figma or Sketch workflows
   Learn more about Userback:

   • Check out Userback on their website
2. 

   2

   BugHerd

   Best for tracking visual design bugs and issues

   • Free trial available
   • From $50/month

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.8/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   BugHerd is a visual bug tracking and website feedback tool that lets teams pin comments directly on live sites, design files, images, and PDFs, with automatic screenshot and browser metadata capture on every submission.

   Who Is BugHerd Best For?

   BugHerd is a strong fit for product managers and UX/UI designers who need to collect and resolve pinned feedback on live websites or uploaded design files.

   Why I Picked BugHerd

   I've included BugHerd in my top picks because it's the strongest tool on this list for catching and resolving visual bugs on live websites. When a reviewer clicks a broken element, BugHerd pins the feedback directly to it and automatically captures a screenshot, browser, OS, and screen resolution, so developers get everything they need without a single back-and-forth. I also like its text-edit suggestion feature, which lets reviewers highlight copy on a live page and type a replacement directly, logging the original and proposed text as a task.

   BugHerd Key Features

   • Two-way PM tool sync: BugHerd connects natively with Jira, Asana, ClickUp, Monday.com, and Linear, syncing tasks, comments, and status in both directions.
   • Video feedback recording: Reviewers can record up to one minute of screen and voice feedback, with OS and browser details attached automatically to each submission.
   • Public feedback widget: A site-embedded widget lets visitors report issues directly on live pages, with optional email capture for follow-up.
   • AI auto-tagging and duplicate detection: BugHerd's AI beta automatically tags incoming tasks and flags similar submissions to help teams spot duplicate reports before they pile up.

   BugHerd Integrations

   BugHerd offers 21+ native integrations, including Figma, Jira, Asana, ClickUp, Monday.com, Linear, Trello, and GitHub. It also supports custom connections through its REST API and webhooks, plus Zapier.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Supports video, image, PDF, and Figma feedback
   • Captures screenshots and browser details automatically
   • Pins feedback directly onto live websites

   Cons:

   • Imports Figma screens as static images
   • Provides no design version comparison
   Learn more about BugHerd:

   • Check out BugHerd on their website
3. 

   3

   Miro

   Best for collaborative brainstorming and ideation

   • Free plan + 14-day free trial + free demo available
   • From $8/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.8/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Miro is a collaborative whiteboard platform that supports design feedback through pinned canvas comments, threaded discussions, AI-summarized review threads, and two-way integrations with tools like Jira, Asana, and Figma.

   Who Is Miro Best For?

   Miro works well for product managers and design directors who need to run cross-functional review cycles inside a tool their whole team already uses.

   Why I Picked Miro

   I've included Miro in my top picks because it's the tool I reach for when design feedback needs to happen inside the same space where the work is being shaped. The canvas lets teams place sticky notes and pinned comments directly on prototype screens, and Miro AI can summarize long comment threads and convert feedback into backlog items via Flows. When cross-functional stakeholders need to weigh in without a Figma license, Miro's visitor and guest access model keeps the conversation moving.

   Miro Key Features

   • Conversation summaries: Miro AI condenses long comment threads into short summaries using GPT-4.0, available on all plans.
   • Guest access without paid seats: Invited guests on Business and above can view, comment, and mention teammates on private boards without using a paid seat.
   • Two-way Jira sync: Jira Cards connect Miro boards to Jira Cloud, Server, and Data Center, syncing edits in both directions via webhooks.
   • Board history and versioning: Boards are automatically saved every hour and at session end, with versions stored for 90 days and restorable as a separate board.

   Miro Integrations

   Miro offers 250+ integrations, including Figma, Adobe XD, Sketch, Jira, Asana, Azure DevOps, Linear, ClickUp, Trello, Slack, and Microsoft Teams. It also provides a REST API, SDKs, MCP server, and Zapier.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • AI summarizes lengthy review threads
   • External reviewers can join through links
   • Pinned comments stay attached to visual assets

   Cons:

   • Comments lack assignees and due dates
   • No live-website annotation or browser capture
   Learn more about Miro:

   • Check out Miro on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Miro
   • Explore best alternatives to Miro
4. 

   4

   PageProof

   Best for automated version diffing

   • Free demo + 10-day free trial available
   • From $249/month

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.9/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   PageProof is an online proofing tool that lets teams annotate, review, and approve creative assets—including static files, live websites, Figma prototypes, HTML emails, video, and audio—within structured, multi-step approval workflows.

   Who Is PageProof Best For?

   PageProof is a strong fit for marketing and creative teams that manage high volumes of structured review cycles across multiple file types.

   Why I Picked PageProof

   PageProof earns its spot on my shortlist because of how well it handles version comparison specifically. Smart Compare automatically calculates visual differences between two versions, with a slider or quick-flick toggle and highlight overlays that make it easy to catch even subtle shifts. Smart Check goes further by surfacing hidden metadata changes like fonts, color profiles, and file dimensions during the compare. I've found that combination genuinely useful when reviewing multiple rounds of a campaign asset where small, hard-to-spot changes matter most.

   PageProof Key Features

   • Multi-format proof creation: Create proofs from static files, live website URLs, Figma prototype links, HTML emails, video, and audio—all within the same workspace.
   • Structured multi-step workflows: Assign roles like owner, gatekeeper, and approver across sequential review steps, with decision thresholds and automated reminders at the proof level.
   • Comment filtering and export: Filter comments by status, page, commenter, @mentions, keyword, and more, then export the full comment set to CSV.
   • Design tool plugins: Review, reply to, and resolve comments directly inside Figma, Adobe InDesign, Photoshop, Illustrator, and other creative apps without leaving your design environment.

   PageProof Integrations

   PageProof offers native integrations with Figma, Adobe Creative Cloud, Canva, Jira, Asana, monday.com, ClickUp, Trello, Slack, and Microsoft Teams. Enterprise plans add webhooks, an advanced API, and an SDK; Zapier and Make are also supported.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Structured approvals preserve comment context
   • Live website markup reflects rendered pages
   • Automated version diffing catches subtle changes

   Cons:

   • Large documents can trigger occasional glitches
   • Comment status lacks assignees and due dates
   Learn more about PageProof:

   • Check out PageProof on their website
5. 

   5

   Filestage

   Best for structured multi-stage creative approvals

   • 30-day free trial + free plan + free demo available
   • From $199/month

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.7/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Filestage is an online proofing and creative review platform that supports pinned annotation, staged reviewer workflows, version comparison, and feedback consolidation across images, video, documents, and live websites.

   Who Is Filestage Best For?

   Filestage is a strong fit for creative and marketing teams that manage multi-stage approval workflows with external stakeholders, clients, or regulated reviewers.

   Why I Picked Filestage

   Filestage earns its spot on my shortlist because of how well it handles structured, multi-stage creative approvals. I love that you can build separate reviewer groups, so design goes to internal stakeholders first, then to legal, then to the client, each in sequence. Paired with staged review decisions and exportable PDF audit reports, every approval cycle is fully traceable.

   Filestage Key Features

   • Live website and prototype review: Import any URL to comment directly on a rendered live site or interactive prototype, with each comment automatically saving a screenshot, screen size, and browser details.
   • Unlimited guest reviewers: External stakeholders can access and annotate files on any plan via a shared link, with no account required.
   • Adobe plugin integrations: Native plugins for Premiere Pro, After Effects, InDesign, and Photoshop let creative teams send files to Filestage and sync feedback without leaving their tools.
   • AI-powered Review Agents: Automated agents check files for grammar, compliance, forbidden terms, required logos, and barcodes on Business and Enterprise plans.

   Filestage Integrations

   Filestage offers native integrations with Adobe Premiere Pro, After Effects, InDesign, Photoshop, Google Drive, Dropbox, and monday.com. It also provides a Jira marketplace app, webhooks, a REST API on Business and higher, and Zapier.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Guests review without creating accounts
   • Staged approvals separate design, legal, clients
   • Pin comments to exact visual locations

   Cons:

   • No automatic image difference detection
   • Resolved comments stay hidden from guests
   Learn more about Filestage:

   • Check out Filestage on their website
6. 

   6

   ReviewStudio

   Best for multi-format proofing with unlimited guests

   • Free trial + free demo available
   • From $12/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.7/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   ReviewStudio is an online proofing and design feedback tool that supports annotation, version comparison, and approval workflows across images, video, PDFs, audio, 3D files, and live websites.

   Who Is ReviewStudio Best For?

   ReviewStudio suits creative agencies and marketing teams that review a wide mix of file types—video, PDF, images, and live websites—with clients or external stakeholders who shouldn't need a paid account.

   Why I Picked ReviewStudio

   I picked ReviewStudio as one of the best because no other tool on my shortlist handles as many file types while keeping external reviewers completely free. I love how live website annotation works here: reviewers switch between Interact mode to click through a real page and Annotate mode to drop pinned comments, all through a live URL proxy. Pair that with unlimited guests on every plan, including the free tier, and client review rounds stop being a seat-counting headache.

   ReviewStudio Key Features

   • Side-by-side compare mode: View any two file versions simultaneously with synced pan, zoom, and video playback to spot differences across revisions.
   • Automated diff highlighting: Toggle a diff overlay in compare mode to highlight pixel-level differences in red between two same-size files.
   • Multi-stage approval workflows: Build branching workflows with per-stage deadlines, custom goals, and checklist requirements reviewers must complete before approving.
   • PM tool integrations: Native connections to Asana, Monday.com, and Wrike sync review tasks and approvals directly into your existing project management setup.

   ReviewStudio Integrations

   ReviewStudio offers native integrations with Asana, monday.com, Wrike, and Kantata, plus an Adobe Photoshop plugin. It also supports Make, an API with webhooks, and Zapier.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Version diffing clarifies revision changes
   • Live website markup captures interactive feedback
   • Unlimited guests simplify external review rounds

   Cons:

   • Mobile canvas can feel glitchy
   • Tasks lack an in-progress status
   Learn more about ReviewStudio:

   • Check out ReviewStudio on their website
7. 

   7

   zipBoard

   Best for multi-format assets with no per-seat fees

   • 14-day free trial
   • From $99/month

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.3/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   zipBoard is a visual markup and feedback tool that lets teams annotate live websites, PDFs, images, videos, and SCORM files—turning comments into trackable tasks with assignees, statuses, and Kanban views.

   Who Is zipBoard Best For?

   zipBoard suits product managers and creative directors who need to review multiple asset types—websites, PDFs, videos, and SCORM files—without paying per seat.

   Why I Picked zipBoard

   I picked zipBoard as one of the best because it's the only tool on my list that lets you review live websites, PDFs, videos, and SCORM files in one workspace without charging per seat. I especially like that guest reviewers can annotate directly on a live staging URL, leaving pinned comments with automatic browser and resolution metadata captured, without ever creating an account. Comments convert into assignable tasks with statuses, due dates, and a Kanban view, so nothing gets lost across asset types.

   zipBoard Key Features

   • Live website annotation: Paste any live or staging URL into zipBoard and leave pinned comments, draw shapes, and add markup directly on the page without exporting anything.
   • Time-stamped video commenting: Reviewers can leave comments tied to specific moments in a video, keeping feedback precise and easy to act on.
   • Device mode emulation: Switch between screen sizes within the review environment to annotate and test how designs look at different resolutions.
   • Custom task statuses: Admins can create organization-level statuses beyond the defaults, with AI-suggested options tailored to your project type.

   zipBoard Integrations

   zipBoard offers integrations with Jira, Wrike, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Procore, and LambdaTest. It also supports custom connections through its developer API and Zapier.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • No-login reviewers simplify stakeholder feedback
   • Live website annotations capture browser context
   • Multi-format asset reviews in one workspace

   Cons:

   • Comment bubbles can obscure screen details
   • Manual version comparisons lack visual diffs
   Learn more about zipBoard:

   • Check out zipBoard on their website
8. 

   8

   Atarim

   Best for web design project management

   • Free plan + free demo available
   • From $35/user/month

   Visit Website

   

   Atarim is a visual feedback and web design collaboration tool that lets teams and clients leave pinned comments on live websites, staging environments, design files, and PDFs, with built-in task tracking, approval workflows, and integrations with tools like Jira, Asana, and Figma.

   Who Is Atarim Best For?

   Atarim is a strong fit for web agencies managing client feedback across multiple live sites, staging environments, and WordPress builds.

   Why I Picked Atarim

   I picked Atarim as one of the best because it's the only tool I've used that lets you pin feedback directly onto a live website or staging environment, with every comment automatically creating a task with a screenshot attached. For web design project management specifically, that means no more copying feedback from emails into a tracker. I also like that it handles the full review cycle: tasks carry statuses, priorities, assignees, and due dates, and clients can formally approve individual pages with a recorded timestamp.

   Atarim Key Features

   • Guest commenting: Clients can leave pinned feedback using just a name and email, with no account or software install required.
   • Responsive breakpoint review: Fixed desktop, tablet, and mobile views let you capture feedback at specific screen sizes, with the breakpoint recorded on each task.
   • Figma plugin: Push frames and new design versions from Figma directly into Atarim, and carry existing Figma comments across into the task workflow.
   • Two-way project management sync: Tasks sync bidirectionally with Asana, Jira, Trello, and Basecamp, so closing a task in one tool closes it in the other.

   Atarim Integrations

   Atarim offers native integrations with Figma, Asana, Jira, Trello, and Basecamp. It also supports Make, webhooks, a REST API, and Zapier for custom integrations.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Supports client approvals with recorded timestamps
   • Converts comments into trackable tasks
   • Pins feedback directly onto live websites

   Cons:

   • Guest reviewers receive no email notifications
   • Version comparison lacks documented visual diffs
   Learn more about Atarim:

   • Check out Atarim on their website
9. 

   9

   GoVisually

   Best for CPG and packaging label review cycles

   • 7-day free trial available
   • From $16/user/month (min. 3 users, billed annually)

   Visit Website

   

   GoVisually is a design feedback and proofing tool that supports annotation on images, PDFs, and video, with version comparison, approval workflows, and AI-powered label compliance checks built for packaging and CPG review cycles.

   Who Is GoVisually Best For?

   GoVisually is a strong fit for packaging and CPG teams that need to manage label compliance, artwork approvals, and multi-stakeholder review cycles in one place.

   Why I Picked GoVisually

   GoVisually earns its spot on my shortlist because no other tool I've tested matches its depth for packaging label review cycles. I love that the AI compliance suite checks labels against 50+ regulatory frameworks, from FDA to EU and Brazil, automatically catching text, color, and layout changes before they become costly print errors. Pair that with Time Machine's full revision timeline and four compare modes including a color-highlighted Diff view, and you have a tool built for the exact high-stakes, multi-stakeholder approval loops CPG teams run every day.

   GoVisually Key Features

   • PDF text markup: Highlight, replace, or strike through text directly on PDFs so reviewers can call out exact copy changes without guesswork.
   • Guest reviewer access: External stakeholders can comment and approve using just their name and email, with no account required.
   • Bird's-eye dashboard: A proof-level overview displays every proof's status, due dates, and overdue items across your active projects in one view.
   • Adobe Creative Cloud plugin: Designers can share files, view comment threads, and check approval status without leaving Photoshop, Illustrator, or InDesign.

   GoVisually Integrations

   GoVisually has three documented native integrations: Adobe Creative Cloud, Asana, and Slack. It also supports Zapier and offers an API for custom integrations.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • External reviewers avoid account creation
   • Four modes compare design revisions
   • Specialized CPG label compliance checks

   Cons:

   • Individual comments lack assignees
   • Website reviews require beta captures
   Learn more about GoVisually:

   • Check out GoVisually on their website
10. 

    10

    Ziflow

    Best for enterprise creative and marketing approvals

    • Free trial + free demo available
    • Pricing upon request

    Visit Website

    Customer Rating:4.6/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

    

    Ziflow is an online proofing platform built for creative and marketing teams that supports annotation, multi-stage approval workflows, version comparison, and live website review across images, video, audio, HTML5, and documents.

    Who Is Ziflow Best For?

    Ziflow is a strong fit for creative directors and marketing ops teams that manage high volumes of asset reviews across multiple stakeholders and approval stages.

    Why I Picked Ziflow

    Ziflow earns its spot as one of the best on my shortlist because it's purpose-built for the kind of high-volume, multi-stakeholder approval workflows that enterprise creative and marketing teams actually run. I love its multi-stage workflow engine, which lets you sequence or parallelize approval stages with gating, deadlines, and automated routing so nothing stalls in someone's inbox. Auto Compare is another standout: it highlights pixel-level differences between proof versions, catching text shifts and color changes across static assets and video without manual side-by-side squinting.

    Ziflow Key Features

    • Live website proofing: Reviewers can annotate directly on a live URL or a static snapshot, with proxy controls to manage how the site loads.
    • Guest reviewer access: Unlimited external reviewers can view, comment, and approve proofs from an emailed link without needing a Ziflow account or paid seat.
    • Multi-asset and campaign proofs: Multiple files, including images, video, audio, and HTML5, can be grouped into a single proof for consolidated feedback across a campaign.
    • Comment labels and filters: Reviewers can tag comments with custom labels and filter threads by reviewer, stage, label, or status to keep feedback organized across large projects.

    Ziflow Integrations

    Ziflow documents integrations with Figma, Adobe Creative Cloud, Final Cut Pro X, Jira Cloud, Asana, monday.com, Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint, and Slack. It also offers a REST API, webhooks, intake forms, and Zapier.

    Pros and Cons

    Pros:

    • Unlimited guest reviews avoid seat bottlenecks
    • Multi-stage approvals keep campaigns moving
    • Frame-level markup across diverse asset types

    Cons:

    • Resolved-only status obscures ongoing work
    • Static Figma proofs miss prototype interactions
    Learn more about Ziflow:

    • Check out Ziflow on their website